So what the lawyers are saying is that the apartment is a significant part of the problem.  But there is a question about a possible difference between a racist network and covering for people later on the basis of race.  Also, when taking sides, is it because they think you are racist, or because they think the harassers are no racist, or innocent, which could also be two different things.

I have to say that I don't think it is that complicated, and I also don't think it matters if it happens on bridge  property or not. It is simply harassment, I don't know the people, it is obviously organized, even if it is hive behavior, and it is in very close proximity to me personally as I walk to go anywhere. Definitely the escalation would suggest a further threat, but I do not believe you have to prove danger. You can prove annoyance on purpose and that is something. And then the fact that that is the only reason they are there. They have no other errand.

And then the bridge is saying that their elevator repair notice serves as an eviction notice because of my predicted logic about the license factor.

But to me, it is a sign in another language that means, "We do no respect you whatsoever and you are welcome to tell the public anything because it is worth it to have you as our community pinata. In fact, that makes it more fun because that is also our audience.