Ok everyone, this is Refried. I just got back my other Kirkus review and I think I am not publishing it. I think I am going to end with a thumbs down on the service.
I kind of appreciate their feedback and I think some of what they said was legitimate but I think they mostly saw it as more poorly written than it was. Like that is my thing, to come across as amateur and deliver on some genius elements of philosophy and wit.
And I also feel a silencing from their policy. Like I can't say the key word that I think they were wrong about because it is quoting the review without letting them publish it. That is just too controlling for me. I paid the money and I should own the review.
I was mostly happy with the first review on Sparkity Bonkins even though I felt that they had kind of taken a lower view of the book than it deserved. Like they were hard on it and it probably did deserve a star. It just does have some exceptional creativity. And this one is also saturated with cute and clever ideas. I mean it is a blast of art. And the most notable thing are the two plots which both have incredibly interesting climactic moments and resolutions.
I think all they could see was that maybe I tried to write a novel and wasn't strong enough. They couldn't see past what to me are just casual elements. I think they were genuinely fooled and for some reason took for granted the prophetic level of actually very compelling characters. The characters are developed more internally than externally, that is part of the point. People don't have to like it, but to say I ramble when it is the most condense and classic plot that some readers would probably have ever read is likely from just a weak reader who thought I didn't know what I was doing.
And then I think also in my own critique of what Kirkus generally offers, I agree with others who have said they provide too much of a summary and not enough evaluation. And for this donut novel, there was plenty to praise, but in their one or two lines devoted to actual opinion, they just chose weird random things to look down on. Also in the summary, they make it sound boring, like a day's work, when what happens immediately in the book is something absolutely ridiculous that could never happen in our world. Again, I can't quote the a summary line of my own book, because I am not publishing the review.
I felt when I turned it in that it would either be a star or it would be mostly negative. And it is only mildly negative but definitely missed the main appeal of the book. It is kind of interesting how vividly absent the core features of the novel are. They made their choice of what to focus on and how to present it as a sloppy good try. And had to overlook some striking elements of idea after idea, brave humor and skillful plotting. The exact opposite of their conclusion.